Date
Submitted |
Action Alert |
| 21 Dec 01 |
People in Taiwan are Dining On Aborted Fetuses!
Don't believe me? If you have the stomach for it, see it for yourself in
this Powerpoint slideshow.
Caution!!! Graphic images almost too
impossible to believe contained
herein!!
If you know someone who has the power to do something
about this unspeakable evil, please do what you can! Contact the
media, other prolifers, or someone in Taiwan and ask them to investigate
this!
|
| 23 Jul 01 |
From: "Stephen Panchyshyn" <panchy0001@earthlink.net>
To: "Jack R. Voltz (Pirate Pete)"
Subject: Re: An Idea
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2001
I have a request. Lately, I have been going to banks that are in
supermarkets and getting $25 dollar rolls of the Sacagawea dollar. Anyway,
I have been making an earnest effort to put them into circulation. Why? I
looked at the coin and noticed the subliminal Pro-Life message, Mother AND
child! This is the only legal tender bearing a mother and child. Can you
put out some word to ask us pro-lifers to get these circulated so we can
make the abortionists go mad?
|
| 11 May 01 |
From: "Andrea Arnoult" <ioujesus@hotmail.com>
At www.operationoutcry.org women can print out an Amicus Curiae (Friend of the Court) Brief to sign, adding their names to the list of those who support the overturning of Roe v Wade. If anyone you know has ever had an abortion and now regrets it, there are additional forms for them to tell their story, confidentially if they prefer, in support of petitioning the Justice Department to have Roe v Wade declared a decision that is not in the best interests of women and children. Please pass this information on to anyone you know who may be interested. Thanks and God Bless!
Andrea
|
| 01 Mar 01 |
Dear Friend of Life:
Bill Clinton last year defied the intent of Congress and
tortured the law to allow Frankenstein-like experiments
on aborted babies. But now the National Institute for
Health (NIH) has received applications for funding this
'research' with your tax dollars! NIH is set to release
money for this threat to the unborn - BUT THE ACTUAL
GRANTS OF MONEY WILL NOT BE MADE UNTIL
SOMETIME IN MARCH!!!
But you can help stop the release of funding for these
experiments by acting now! If you will help me right now
by signing this petition, we can still persuade President
Bush and his new Health and Human Services Secretary
Tommy Thompson to FREEZE these grants pending
further review - and then eliminate them altogether.
And make no mistake, such grants are evil and immoral!
There is NO moral or scientific justification for this
research. It is simply unethical to exploit the death of
aborted babies for profit or scientific ambition.
Please click HERE to sign our petition to help
stop this.
Alan Keyes
|
| 30 Jan 01 |
To whom it may concern,
I am from Belfast Northern Ireland and I am a person (one of many) who is strongly against Abortion. This country has no Abortion clinics whatsoever, something which we devout Christians are very proud of. However, recently we have learnt that our local politicians want to advocate and bring Abortion to our country and this is something that we are apalled at. This strikes at the heart of all who oppose this action by our so-called elected representatives who do not take into consideration those they represent.
I am approaching you and your organisation for help and advice as I wish to set up a campaign and organisation to challenge this motion which (and I use loosely) our politicians wish to force upon us.
Because we cannot hear the screams doesn't mean its clean
The holocaust of the Unborn must be stopped.
Any and all help will be greatly appreciated,
Yours in the fight against Abortion
Mynros
|
| 07 Jan 01 |
From: "Alan Keyes Network" <ambassador@keyes2000.org>
Subject: Abolish Clintonism!
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 19:07:34 -0800
Dear Faithful Friend:
As you know, Bill Clinton has tried to preserve his evil "legacy" by
writing hundreds of executive orders, including several which condemn
thousands of innocent unborn children to death!
But President George Bush can overturn many of these by writing new
executive orders as soon as he takes office January 20th -- IF you will
help me put pressure on him by clicking on the following and signing the
petition immediately.
Don't let this opportunity pass to overturn Clintonism with a stroke of
the pen. Complete your on-line petition today at
http://www.conservativepetitions.com/abortion.html ! God bless you!
Keep Faith,
Alan Keyes
P.S. It is absolutely necessary this happen right away or it will not
have the desired impact on President-elect Bush!
|
| 20 Nov 00 |
From: Brian McCaughey
Subject: Please help!
Hi there, my name is Mike an I have a problem
that I need some help with.
A friend of mine has had 2 late term abortions to date
and her reason was because "the pill" makes her feel queasy
and ill. I have tried to talk to her about other methods
and options but she does not listen. In fact she seems to
have the attitude that if all else fails an abortion will
solve her troubles.
I dated her for three years and just found out after our
breakup that one of those murders would have been my child.
I am so opposed to abortions that I think it may be the
reason for her lack of willingness to listen. I don't know
what to do or say any longer.
If anyone can help please send her some info about other
methods [of birth control]. Thanks a lot.
Her address is:
Nadia Columna
75 Ironstone Dr.
Cambridge, ON
Canada
N1p 1a2
|
| 02 Oct 00 |
From: DFJosephMD@aol.com
Source: National Right to Life Action Alert; September 22, 2000
Congressional Alert on Stem Cell ResearchWashington -- Sometime between now and October 6 (probably during
the week of Oct. 1), the U.S. Senate is expected to conduct a test
vote on the "Stem Cell Research Act of 2000" (S. 2015), a bill authored
by pro-abortion Senator Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) to legalize federal funding
of research that kills human embryos.
This will be "cloture vote," which means that Sen. Specter will lose
unless he musters 60 votes. The pro-life vote on cloture is NO. A close
vote is anticipated.
Please take a few minutes to call or fax your Senators and encourage them
to vote NO on cloture on the Stem Cell Bill. You can reach any Senator by
calling 1-202-224-3121
The following senators especially need to hear from as many pro-life
constituents as possible. Their office phone numbers (each have the 202
area code) and stances are included for your benefit.
Bayh (D-IN) (224-5623) (believed to lean pro-Specter)
Bennett (R-UT) (224-5444) (uncertain)
Breaux (D-LA) (224-4623) (unknown)
Campbell (R-CO) (224-5852) (believed to lean pro-Specter)
Cochran (R-MS) (224-5054) (unknown)
Conrad (D-ND) (224-2043) (unknown)
Dorgan (D-ND) (224-2551) (unknown)
Gregg (R-NH) (224-3324) (generally pro-life, but not yet confirmed
on this issue)
Hatch (R-UT) (224-5251) (undecided)
Hutchison (R-TX) (224-5922) (leans pro-Specter)
Lugar (R-IN) (224-4814) (noncommital)
Roth (R-DE) (224-4441) (undecided)
Shelby (R-AL) (224-5744) (leans pro-life)
Warner (R-VA) (224-2023) (unknown)
Note: No Democratic senator has yet committed to oppose the
Specter bill. In addition, the following Republican senators are
considered certain or very likely to vote with Specter in favor of cloture
and could use extra calls and faxes.
Stevens (R-AK), Mack (R-FL), Collins (R-ME), Snowe (R-ME), Gordon Smith
(R-OR), Specter (R-PA), Chafee (R-RI), Thurmond (R-SC), Jeffords (R-VT)
|
| 05 May 00 |
From: Matt Marrazzo (pjbforpres@yahoo.com)
Subject: Virginians for Life
I am a member of the Reform Party in northern VA, and
a supporter of Pat Buchanan for President. I am
looking for other conservative, pro-life persons who
will support Pat for President to get in touch with
me. In particular, I need folks who will sign a VA
state Ballot Access Petition to get Pat on the General
election ballot for November 7, 2000. Please have
any/all Virginians who are interested to contact me at
pjbforpres@yahoo.com
Please feel free to re-distribute this message to any
who you believe may be interested.
Thank-you,
Matt Marrazzo
|
| 05 May 00 |
From: DFJosephMD@aol.com
Subject: FATHER'S DAY SUPREME COURT PICKET
Dear Friends,
F.A.C.T.1 (Fathers of Aborted Children Together as1)
are making plans and preparations to hold a rally and
picket at both, Lafayette Park, across the street form the
White House and in front of the Supreme Court on Father's
Day in order to show support for the plight of the Fathers of
an aborted child. This demonstration and picket will be held
in peaceful and thought provoking manner.
Please, spread this message to all you know. They are the
forgotten group and they need our help.
For more information -- here is their website:
http://www.FACT1.org
E-mail -- fact1@fact1.org
Frank Joseph MD
|
| 02 May 00 |
From: DAVE’S DIGEST 2000 #8
SUPREME COURT CONSIDERS NEBRASKA PBA BANWashington -- Pro-life advocates across the country are intently focused
on the U.S. Supreme Court as it considers its first major abortion case
since 1992.
Douglas W. Kmiec, a law professor at the University of Notre Dame, said
the high court has already set a precedent in establishing that states can
place some limits on abortions, including requiring parental notification
for abortions performed on minors.
While it is unpredictable what the court will do in this case, he said it
is very likely that a majority of the justices will be swayed by the
descriptions of the particular abortion procedure at issue, "which is very
troubling to many people, including people who generally support abortion
rights."
Clarke Forsythe, president of Americans United for Life, said the court's
eventual decision ``will have widespread legal, legislative and medical
implications for infant rights.''
"Partial-birth abortion breaches the wall between abortion and
infanticide," he added.
"Location matters," says James Bopp, who filed a brief on behalf of the
National Right to Life Committee. "The right to an abortion arises because
the child is inside the mother. But now we have a child that is but inches
away from being outside ...."
"I think this is a truly national case," Nebraska Attorney General Don
Stenberg said. "In all likelihood, the decision in Nebraska will either
uphold or lead to the overturning of the laws in virtually every other
state" with a ban.
In a brief submitted to the Supreme Court in today's case, the Family
Research Council urges the Court to "uphold [Nebraska's] partial-birth
abortion ban as a reasonable and necessary means of protecting neonatal
and partially born human life." FRC argues that "the partial-birth
abortion method is akin to infanticide, as a majority of state
legislators, governors and members of both houses of Congress already
agree."
Carrie Gordon Earll of Focus on the Family, said: "The question before the
court in Stenberg v. Carhart is whether the highest court in the land will
sanction infanticide. Partial-birth abortion is never medically necessary,
is actually dangerous to the health of women and brutally kills a living
child just inches from birth. Surely our founding fathers never envisioned
infanticide as a constitutional right."
A Concerned Women for America press release noted: "The use of
partial-birth abortion is proof that abortionists will place their own
convenience and profits above the patients' health. The arguments against
bans on this gruesome method show no concern for the baby or the resulting
effects on society. This [Nebraska] case will allow the Supreme Court to
deal with the Pandora's box they opened by attempting to legitimize
abortion" (The case was opened on April 26th and the court is expected
to issue its ruling about the end of June.)
Source: The Pro-Life Infonet
|
| 02 May 00 |
Pray for the Supreme Court
From: Pirate Pete
To: All prolifers and prayer warriors
Once again, the Supreme Court of the United
States is faced with a monumental choice--whom will they
serve? Satan or God? The upcoming decision on partial-birth
abortion looms on the horizon, and a decision is expected
sometime next month.
I hate to say it, but the Supreme Court has an
extremely poor track record in decisions related to
abortion. Thanks to "Justice" Harry Blackmun, who
led the charge to loose the abortion demons on this
nation, as a nation, we are now awash with the blood
of innocents, blood more than enough to fill the valley
of Jezreel to the horse's bridle.
The Lord is anguished. The blood of His innocent martyrs
cries out for justice to be meted out to our nation
and our world. Yet we must pray for God's Mercy, not His
Judgment. How easy it would be to throw up our hands and
cry out to the Lord, "Punish us, O Lord!" God does not want
to chastise us, but in his Justice, He will soon be forced
to do just that unless we pray now!
Dear Lord,
Guide the men and women of the
Supreme Court. Help them to make
a truly JUST decision. Open their
eyes to your Truth, let them see the
horror of partial-birth abortion, of
ALL abortion. Please grant that they
should leave untouched all existing
partial-birth abortion bans. We ask
this through the name of your Divine
Son, Our Redeemer, Jesus Christ. Amen.
|
| 21 Apr 00 |
Subject: URGENT--OPINION POLL ON ABORTION MILL--PLEASE VOTE FOR US!
From: People for Life, Inc.
Please go to the Erie Times News website as soon as
possible and vote in today's opinion poll. The question
is: SHOULD DR. BRIGHAM GET APPROVAL TO OPEN AN ABORTION CLINIC
[in Erie, Pennsylvania]?
Find the link to the survey question on the
left side of your screen. [Ed. note: This link brings up
a popup window with 6 radio buttons, each of which
represent a single voting option. I tried to vote, but
after clicking on an option, I received no indication
that my vote had been registered.]
PLEASE forward this message to everyone you can
think of, NEAR AND FAR, and do it ASAP. (Thanks !!)
Note: Either of the last two voting options offer
totally valid reasons for voting NO.
Please feel free to share this information with anyone
who might be interested.
New subscribers to the People For Life mailing
list are welcome. Send requests to: subscribe@peopleforlife.org
1625 West 26th Street
P.O. Box 1126
Erie, PA 16512
Phone / FAX: 814-459-1333
pfl@peopleforlife.org
http://www.peopleforlife.org
|
| 31 Mar 00 |
From: DFJosephMD@aol.com
ALERT: U.S. House to Vote on Partial-Birth Abortion April 5th
Washington -- The U.S. House of Representatives is scheduled to take up
the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act (HR 3660) ON THE MORNING OF WEDNESDAY,
APRIL 5.
This is the first time that the House will vote on the issue during the
106th Congress. While the bill will undoubtedly pass the House, we are
hoping to once against muster a two-thirds majority, since that is what
will later be required if we are to override President Clinton's
anticipated veto. Therefore, calls should be generated to House members
-- especially those first elected in the 1998 election -- to urge them to
(1) support the bill, and (2) vote with the pro-life side against all
weakening amendments and motions, including the "motion to recommit."
The most recent House vote on banning partial-birth abortions occurred
during the 105th Congress, on July 23, 1998 when the House voted 296-132
to override President Clinton's veto of the bill. (The Senate fell three
votes short of the two-thirds margin necessary for override in September,
1998.) During the current (106th) Congress, the Senate took the lead,
passing a version of the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act (S. 1692) on
October 21, 1999, by a vote of 63-34. Two pro-life senators were absent
on that vote, which means that the pro-life side fell only two votes short
of showing veto-override strength -- our best showing yet in the Senate.
National Right to Life anticipates that opponents of the bill will offer a
killer substitute, either as a substitute amendment or as the motion to
recommit. Most likely, the gutting alternative will be based on the
so-called "Late-Term Abortion Restriction Act" (HR 2149) proposed by Reps.
Hoyer and Greenwood, a hollow measure concocted to provide political cover
for opponents of the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act. The Hoyer-Greenwood
proposal would apply absolutely no restrictions to partial-birth abortions
until after a baby is provably "viable" -- that is, in the seventh month
or later. Moreover, the Hoyer-Greenwood proposal would allow even the
killing of provably "viable" babies in the seventh, eighth, and ninth
months to enhance the "mental health" of the mother, as the sponsors
explicitly confirmed in a March 16 "Dear Colleague" letter -- even though
these infants could enjoy full lifespans if delivered alive.
A vote in favor of the substitute will (1) allow partial-birth abortions
without meaningful limitation, and (2) to allow even third-trimester
abortions, by whatever method, for "mental health," which Mr. Hoyer
elsewhere has explained includes "psychological trauma." Legally, this
language is all-encompassing. It is no restriction at all.
Please call Congress today at 202-224-3121 and encourage your member of
Congress to support the ban on partial-birth abortions.
Please pass this alert on to every pro-life person you know.
|
| 03 Feb 00 |
[Ed. note: I received the following letter from Chris Bell today.
If you're trying to figure out what you can do to help
the prolife movement, please consider donating to
Chris's organization, Good Counsel, a
crisis pregnancy hotline center and home for unwed mothers. This is what
being prolife is all about!])
February, 2000 A.D.
Dear Friend,
Sandy's wavy, brown hair bounced when she talked
and her eyes lit up when she was excited. That was before
drugs. She was going to finish high school, move back in
with her father, take care of her newborn son when she first
left Good Counsel. It was looking like a success story.
Several months later the phone call: "Chris, it's me.
How ya doin' today?" the strange voice said. It was trying
to sound happy, but had a dull, drawl. I couldn't tell if the
person was just waking up or had been drinking.
"What happened?" I said.
". . . I used drugs. I want to stop, really. I need more help.
Can I come back to the house?"
I admit, I was torn. I was worried. I was worried for
her, for my staff, for the whole house. Could I trust her?
Could I trust us? What could we do? What could she do?
In a sheer moment of unknowing, I just say, "Yes. Yes,
please come back."
"Oh thank you, Chris. Thank you so very much. I'm
gonna try real, real hard."
God, what else could I do? Lord, how is this supposed
to work?
Sr. Mary Jo, God rest her soul, was the house manager
on Staten Island at the time Sandy came back. "Chris,
when she told me she had used drugs, I just thought, she
needs help. I thought when I meet Jesus and He asks me
how many times you had forgiven her, what can I say? I
have to give her another chance."
I knew Sister, and Our Lord, were teaching me a
lesson.
Sandy started going to an outpatient drug program,
every day. She was going for weeks, leaving early in the
morning, coming home just in time for dinner.
Finally, it was determined that Sandy needed a
residential drug rehabilitation program. That meant having
her son live with another relative, a distant cousin. Sandy
agreed and was determined to do better.
Sister and I would drive two hours to visit her. She
was getting some of her bounce back in her life, but she
admitted, that even while she was going to the outpatient
drug program while living in our home, she was getting high,
smoking marijuana and even snorted coke a few times. We
were dumbfounded.
Now, I kept thinking, how many times am I suppose to
forgive? How many?
Then I thought: How many times have I fallen? How
many times have I let God down? How many times have I
hurt people?
I've hurt those I said I loved. I hurt those
closest friends. How many times have I disappointed
people that I don't even know? I was overwhelmed.
Sandy finished the year-long, residential program. She
was going into another step, a halfway house to re-enter
society and get her son back. That's when we lost touch.
That's when she disappeared, again and for good.
I'm thinking about her today because I pray for her
often. I've seen many, many more Sandys since then.
Some have made it. Some have not.
How many times? As many, I guess, as God allows.
St. Paul wrote to the Christians in Ephesis: "Be kind to
one another, compassionate, and mutually forgiving, just as
God has forgiven you in Christ."
Just as God has forgiven me in Jesus, I pray and try to
be forgiving and kind. I know I'm not. I know I fall every
day. And I know all I have to do is ask; God forgives. Our
Lord forgives and forgives and forgives. More than one can
count all the stars. For as long as the oceans rush to the
shore. I am sorry and God forgives.
Know today, that God forgives.
Please help us today offer that forgiveness to another
Sandy. Please support Good Counsel.
I came in early to the office to write this letter, first
stopped in the chapel and before I finished my morning
prayers, the phone rang.
No one was here and I thought it could be an emergency. It was. "Is
this the place that helps mothers?" the young voice asked. Laura was her name.
She then told me
she had been on the street for the past three days; kicked
out by her boyfriend, the father of her two-month-old, who
was in her arms.
The temperature was actually 13 degrees Fahrenheit
this morning, it snowed yesterday and was below freezing
the day before that.
Now, it's almost 10 P.M. and I have to stop. Laura's in
our home with her infant, safe, well fed and warm.
Please keep praying for us all. Please send what you
can. Because I'm late sending this, if you can send a little
extra, that will be a big help.
Know you're in my prayers. I will finish my prayers
with you on my mind tonight too, along with Laura, Sandy,
all the mothers, all the kids.
Peace,
Christopher Bell
P.S. If you could send something extra it would be a
really, big help. Please think about it. Thanks.
(Good Counsel [1-800-723-8331] helps single mothers who are pregnant 24
hours a day with food, clothing, shelter, programs, outreach services and follow-up aid.
Please help Good Counsel by sending a tax-deductible donation today to:
Good Counsel
303 Madison St.
Hoboken, NJ 07030
For more information email us your street address
or call 201-795-0637. Thanks!)
|
| 22 Jan 00 |
RESEARCH GUIDELINES PUT ANIMALS OVER HUMANS
WASHINGTON, Jan 20 (LSN.ca) - A report published by the pro-life committee
of the US Conference of Catholic Bishops notes that the draft government
document on stem cells justifies the destruction of human embryos "by,
among other things, the prospect that use of the resulting cells may reduce
the need to use 'laboratory animals' for drug testing (p. 67576). "The
human embryo ranks lower in status than a laboratory rat," says the
Bishop's letter.
WorldNetDaily drew attention to the bishops' letter yesterday noting
especially that the deadline for public comment on the proposed guidelines
is January 31.
"The guidelines instruct researchers in how to harvest versatile 'stem
cells' from living week-old human embryos, a procedure which kills the
embryos. They also establish standards for harvesting similar cells from
dead unborn children following induced abortions," say the bishops. They
warn, "only a large volume of critical comments by taxpayers will convince
federal lawmakers that people do care about this moral atrocity."
Comments should be sent by January 31, 2000 to "Stem Cell Guidelines" at:
NIH Office of Science Policy
1 Center Drive
Building 1, Room 218
Bethesda, MD 20892
Fax to: (301) 402-0280
E-mail to: stemcell@mail.nih.gov
View the NIH Guidelines.
See the Bishops letter.
Source: LifeSite Daily News (lsn@lifesite.net)
(Reprinted from Dave's Digest 2000 #2)
|
| 27 Sep 99 |
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 15:01:13 -0400
From: Austin Ruse <austinruse@c-fam.org>
Subject: Friday Fax Media Alert/Vatican Contradicts UNFPA Statement
Dear Colleague:
In a statement released this morning in Rome, Vatican spokesman Joaquin
Navarro-Valls flatly contradicted statements made by UNFPA head Dr. Nafis Sadik last week in London. As you recall, astoundingly Sadik claimed the Vatican position on family planning had changed. If you are with the press, this is breaking news. Spead the word.
Yours sincerely,
Austin Ruse
President
Catholic Family & Human Rights Institute
866 United Nations Plaza, Suite 4038
New York, New York 10017
Phone: (212) 754-5948 Fax: (212) 754-9291
E-mail: c-fam@c-fam.org
Website: http://www.c-fam.org
FRIDAY FAX
September 27, 1999
Volume 2, Special Edition
VATICAN CONTRADICTS UNFPA STATEMENT ON INTERNATIONAL FAMILY PLANNING
* In a strongly worded statement released today in Rome, Holy See Press
Office Director Joaquin Navarro-Valls directly contradicted comments
made by the Executive Director of the United Nations Population Fund
(UNFPA) in a London speech last week.
* In a speech announcing the release of UNFPA’s Annual Report on World
Population, Dr. Nafis Sadik said that the Vatican had changed its
long-standing opposition to international family planning programs,
understood by many to include sterilization and abortion. This would
have signaled a significant shift in Vatican policy not just at the UN,
but in dogmatic positions Catholics are required to believe.
* In his statement, Vatican spokesman Navarro-Valls insisted that “the
Holy See has never altered its well-known opposition to abortion or to
family planning techniques and policies as proposed by the United
Nations Population Fund.” Navarro-Valls took the opportunity not just to
contradict the statements of Sadik, but to restate Vatican positions on
these controversial topics.
* Long accused by it opponents of being uncompromisingly “pro-natal,”
Navarro-Valls statement insists that the Holy See “has never supported a
notion of procreation at all costs.” However, the statement charges that
certain programs promoted by UN agencies do not give proper
consideration to what it calls “reciprocity,” which it defines as “the
expression of mutual love and decision-making within a stable, conjugal
relationship.” Instead, the Holy See believes that some UN programs
present “an individualistic and permissive approach to sexual behavior
which corrodes an appropriate comprehension of human dignity and the
moral responsibility of each person.”
* The statement says that such an “individualistic” approach to
sexuality “ruins the family, weakens the responsibility of parents and
harms the well-being of the children, and results in a highly
destabilized effect on society as a whole.”
* Most UN observers view the Holy See as the only consistent opponent to
aggressive forms of family planning that are promoted in UN conference
documents and in programs around the world. Sadik’s comments are seen in
the wider context of ongoing attempts to discredit or weaken the
position of the Holy See in UN debates.
* Sadik’s comments come within weeks of the Holy See’s participation in
the five-year review of the Cairo Conference on Population and
Development, during which the Holy See differed sharply with UNFPA and
most of the industrialized west on the thrust of new ideas in
“reproductive rights.” The Holy See joined the consensus on the
document, but with a long list of “reservations.” Sadik seems to have
used the Holy See’s participation in this conference as an opportunity
to mischaracterize the positions of what she sees as her chief opponent.
Copyright Catholic Family & Human Rights Institute.
Permission for unlimited use hereby granted. Credit requested.
|
| 25 Sep 99 |
From: Cody R. Knotts <crknotts@usaor.net>
To: All prolifers in the Pennsylvania/Tri-State Area
Subject: Need assistance!
I am preparing to run against a pro-choice incumbent that has used his
religious affliation to hide from the abortion issue. I could use your help
and assistance in creating an email tree to contact pro-life individuals over
the net in tri-state area. I need to raise capital to bring this
individual's record to light. Any help and prayers would be appreciated.
Cody R. Knotts
State Representative Candidate for 47th Legislative District
P.O. Box 98
Taylorstown, Pa. 15365
724-948-2372
|
| 14 Sep 99 |
WARNING! The following site contains a very sick picture of a dead baby (Ed. note: the baby's face is obviously photo doctored to make the child look like a monster)
A young man is giving women instructions on At-Home-Abortions (see http://mynie.com/abortion.html). This website address was sent to me via ICQ, by the young man. It shows a photo of a dead baby. I have 2 young children myself and it broke my heart. I am currently writing congress, and anyone else in the public limelight to get this guy off the net. I was hoping for a bit of help through this agency. Thank You, Lisa Sanders.
(Ed. note: This person did not give me an email address for comments, so I must assume she
wants you to visit the site for yourself and send a letter to your local congressmen or
perhaps a "Letter to the Editor". I visited the site just now and it turned my stomach,
which was probably the intended effect. The webmaster of the site ["Tristan"] can be reached at servo@mailexcite.com)
|
| 29 Aug 99 |
From: "MKKS" <mkks@ij.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 00:21:11 -0400
Please help me! Somebody hear me! I want to live!!!
August 28,1999: A judge on Friday affirmed his decision to allow a
14-year-old girl to have a controversial late-term abortion. The girl is to
go to Kansas for the abortion unless an appeal by the Arizona Attorney
General's Office is successful. The child welfare officials say they won't
take her until all appeals have been resolved.Contact List
ACTION ALERT!!!ACTION ALERT!!!ACTION ALERT!!!
CPS told to get teen late-term abortion out of state.
Please use the following contact list to let your views be known.
CONTACT LIST· (602) 542-4331 Governor Hull · (602) 542-5025 Attorney
General Janet Napolitano · (602) 542-3559 AZ State senate · (602) 542-3429
AZ State senate FAX · (602) 542-4221 AZ State house · (602) 542-0102 AZ
State house FAX · (602) 542-5200 Arizona Commision for Judicial Conduct
|
| 22 Jul 99 |
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 16:08:36 -0700
From: Austin Ruse <austinruse@c-fam.org>
To: Friday Fax List <Friday_Fax@cafhri.com>
Subject: Friday Fax/US House Restores UNFPA Funding
Dear Colleague:
Last February in The Hague US First Lady Hillary Clinton promised UNFPA
that its US funding would be restored. That promise took a giant step
forward this week when the full House voted to authorize $25 million for
UNFPA. Not yet a done deal, the money must now go through the
appropriations process.
Spread the word.
Yours sincerely,
Austin Ruse
Director
_______________________________
Catholic Family & Human Rights Institute
866 United Nations Plaza, Suite 4038
New York, New York 10017
Phone: (212) 754-5948 Fax: (212) 754-9291
E-mail: c-fam@c-fam.org Website: http://www.c-fam.org
_________________________________________
FRIDAY FAX
July 23,1999
Volume 2, Number 37
US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AUTHORIZES
$25 MILLION FOR UN POPULATION FUND
- The US House of Representatives voted this week to restore funding for
the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), money that was pulled from
UNFPA last year over the agency’s controversial decision to support
population programs in China. In a surprising show of strength for the
population control establishment, the House voted 221 198 to authorize
US$25 million for UNFPA in the next budget year.
- The UNFPA vote came as part of the American Embassy Security Act of
1999. Congressman Christopher Smith (R-NJ) amended the bill to say that
no US money could go to UNPFA unless the US President could certify that
“the UNFPA has terminated all activities in the People’s Republic of
China, and the United States has received assurances that UNPFA will
conduct no such activities during the fiscal year for which the funds
are to be made available.” Moreover, his amendment required that there
be no coercive abortions in China in the 12 months preceding
certification.
- Smith’s Amendment was not voted upon. Instead members passed the
amendment introduced by Tom Campbell (R-CA) that called for UNPFA
funding as long as US money was held in a separate account. It also
stipulates that no US money can go to China, and that the total US
contribution will be reduced by the exact dollar amount UNFPA intends to
spend in China. This is expected to reduce the US contribution by US$5
million.
- Pro-life Congressional staff members expected a close vote and were
surprised by the final tally. “All the energy was on the other side,”
said Maggie Wynne, staff member of the House pro-life caucus. Wynne said
the House experienced heavy lobbying from UNPFA, the US State
Department, and population control NGOs.
- The US contribution represents a relatively small part of UNFPA’s
annual budget of US$295 million, yet UNFPA looks upon the US donation as
much needed moral approval for what many consider to be controversial
programs. Dr. Nafis Sadik called the vote “excellent news.” She said
“United States leadership is critical in this field not just for money,
but for ethical and moral reasons as well.”
- House members ignored vocal opposition from pro-life and pro-family
lobbyists. Calling it “the UNFPA/forced abortion amendment,” the
National Right to Life Committee (NRLC) charged UNFPA with “assisting
the Chinese population control program, which subjects women to forced
abortion and forced sterilization.” NRLC quoted a 1986 opinion by Judge
Abner Mikva, later legal counsel to President Bill Clinton, that UNFPA
“supports or participates in the management of a program of coercive
abortion.”
- Supporters of UNFPA funding made two arguments. First, that reducing
funding based on abuses in China would not help the situation of the
Chinese, and that withholding the money would harm women in the other
parts of the world.
- The authorization bill now goes before the House Appropriations
Committee. Pro-life Congressmen have not decided upon their approach in
the Appropriations Committee.
Copyright Catholic Family & Human Rights Institute.
Permission for unlimited use hereby given. Credit requested.
|
| 14 Jul 99 |
From: Cody R. Knotts <crknotts@usaor.net>,
PA State Rep. Candidate for 47th Legislative District
To: All Prolifers
I am preparing to run against a pro-choice incumbent that has used his
religious affliation to hide from the abortion issue. I could use your help
and assistance in creating an email tree to contact pro-life individuals over
the net in tri-state area. I need to raise capital to bring this
individual's record to light. Any help and prayers would be appreciated.
|
| 02 Jul 99 |
From: Gary D., Florida
To: All prolife prayer warriors
A Pro life saint in Oregon has breast cancer and needs your prayers.
She has traveled the globe saving babies. She has been in the front of
the battle lines for many years. She has been imprisoned for her actions
on our LORD'S behalf. She has just had her surgery (a radical mastectomy).
Please pray for her quick recovery.
From a brother who loves her and what she is doing. We can't afford to lose her!
|
| 26 Apr 99 |
From: Yellowstone <http://www.yellowstoneinfo.com>
To: All prolifers
Subject: Government seeking scapegoats for the murder of Dr. Slepian
Emergency Note For Pro-Life Saints
Please clip this and pass on to ALL Christian Contacts EVERYWHERE.
Many dozens of people are being ordered to New York to appear before a
Grand Jury to testify everything that they know about Dr. S., and the man
that Janet is trying to frame for his murder. This is causing great
hardship and stress for many.
The word is that the government is building a case to FRAME MANY PRO-LIFE
RESCUERS and other ASSOCIATES along with the man they are seeking, saying
that it was a wide plot of the pro-lifers to kill people - and in this case
Dr. S. I know this doesn't make sense to sane people, Christians, but
remember who is running the government. Look for this case to develop over
the next few months, and for many, many people to be tried in court for
this supposed conspiracy. The government is going to say that when these
people were in jail together, saving babies around the country, that they
were plotting against people and abortion clinics. That by the way is not
a very pro-life thing to do. Satan, through your government, is calling
good evil, and evil good. What was really happening when these Saints were
in jail together was that thousands of Rosaries were being prayed for the
little babies and the people that murder them. You know this, and I know
this.
In taking this action, the government hopes to utterly destroy what is left
of the visible pro-life movement in the United States.
People in high places say that the case will fail, but in the end, the
media will have won another battle, and the administration will have
accomplished its job.
I beg of you to spread the word. Look, I can hardly get my e-mail to work,
but I know that you can do the job. The more coverage the Saints get
regarding this diabolical plot against them, the more prayers that they
will get. Please get this known.
IF YOU CAN GET THE WORD OUT, you may be able to help diffuse this false
case against these CHRISTIANS and save them from this trial in their life
that they are being subject to BECAUSE THEY LOVE JESUS. YOU WILL ALSO BE
SENDING A MESSAGE TO Washington, the UNITED NATIONS And NATO and one to GOD
as well - that YOU WILL NOT COWER IN THE FACE OF EVIL!!!
God's little babies are depending on you.
PLEASE pray hard for everyone involved in pro-life activities at this time.
Satan is unleashing his fury.
God bless you. Get the word out. Do it now.
Jesus Christ Reigns. Don't be afraid to act.
In Jesus & Mary,
Roger Thibault
Yellowstone Information Services
Bloomingdale, Ohio (Go Franciscan!)
http://www.yellowstoneinfo.com
Please copy this. Post this. Put it in your Church bulletins. Let
Protestants and Catholics know what is happening the world over. Let's nip
this in the bud and let Louis and Janet know what we're made of.
PS: There is word in places that Dr. Slepian, who was killed by a
government agent(s) was on the road to conversion to Jesus Christ. Please
forward any additional news that you have on this subject to me, always
keeping in mind that this site is monitored by the powers that be. Some
think that the government took him out while he was still useful to their
diabolic cause.
|